Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

39.9k citations
3.0k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Hematology top 2%
    • Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
    • Platelet Disorders and Treatments

Papers in

    • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management 1.1k
    • Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms 605
    • Platelet Disorders and Treatments 380
    • Hemophilia Treatment and Research 209

Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

2.7k papers receiving 36.5k citations

Peers

Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
Comparison fields: 5 of 185
  • Internal Medicine 10.0k
  • Hematology 9.2k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 8.2k
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 1.6k
  • Genetics 2.1k
Replace Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis with:
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis United States
Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis United States
Platelets United States
European Journal of Internal Medicine Italy
Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis United States
Internal Medicine Journal Australia
Hematology United States
Internal and Emergency Medicine Italy
Current Opinion in Hematology United States
International Journal of Laboratory Hematology United States
Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis relative to Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis United States Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis.

About Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

The 3.0k papers published in Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis in the last decades have received a total of 39.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis usually cover Internal Medicine (1.1k papers), Hematology (1.1k papers), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (915 papers), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (141 papers) and Genetics (209 papers) specifically the topics of Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1.1k papers), Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (605 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (455 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (380 papers), Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis (232 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (228 papers), Hemophilia Treatment and Research (209 papers) and Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases (199 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis are Jawed Fareed, Rodger L. Bick, Viroj Wiwanitkit, Debra Hoppensteadt, Jan Jacques Michiels, Thomas W Stief, Wolfgang Miesbach, Dimitri P. Mikhailidis, Michael Makris and Andreas Clemens.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact