Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities

15.3k citations
648 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

Papers in

Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities

585 papers receiving 13.3k citations

Peers

Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities
Comparison fields: 5 of 152
  • Safety Research 6.8k
  • Occupational Therapy 2.2k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 4.9k
  • Clinical Psychology 6.4k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 4.1k
Replace Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities with:
Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities United States
Exceptionality United States
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education United States
Journal of Special Education Technology United States
Intellectual and developmental disabilities United States
Journal of Early Intervention United States
Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities United States
Preventing School Failure Alternative Education for Children and Youth United States
American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities United States
Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs United Kingdom
Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities relative to Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities United States Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities.

About Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities

The 648 papers published in Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities in the last decades have received a total of 15.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities usually cover Safety Research (304 papers), Occupational Therapy (101 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (246 papers), Clinical Psychology (256 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (126 papers) specifically the topics of Disability Education and Employment (283 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (229 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (177 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (116 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (99 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (88 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (33 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (33 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities are Erik William Carter, Michael L. Wehmeyer, Fred Spooner, Diane M. Browder, Ann P. Turnbull, Jennifer A. Kurth, Carolyn Hughes, Karrie A. Shogren, Wayne S. Sailor and Lauren I. Brookman-Frazee.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact