This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Rice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Rice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rice more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Rice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Rice.
About Rice
The 1.1k papers published in Rice in the last decades have received a total of 37.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Rice usually cover Plant Science (613 papers), Genetics (222 papers), Nutrition and Dietetics (50 papers), Molecular Biology (224 papers) and Insect Science (24 papers) specifically the topics of Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (217 papers), Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement (173 papers), GABA and Rice Research (141 papers), Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (105 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (87 papers), Plant responses to water stress (74 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (67 papers) and Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (64 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Rice are Susan R. McCouch, Naoko K. Nishizawa, Dorian Q. Fuller, Toru Fujiwara, Shimpei Uraguchi, Masahiro Yano, D. J. Mackill, Khurram Bashir, Kshirod Kumar Jena and Yasuhiro Ishimaru.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.