Revija za socijalnu politiku

471 papers and 916 indexed citations i.

About

The 471 papers published in Revija za socijalnu politiku in the last decades have received a total of 916 indexed citations. Papers published in Revija za socijalnu politiku usually cover Economics and Econometrics (108 papers), Sociology and Political Science (69 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (57 papers) specifically the topics of Regional Development and Management Studies (54 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (35 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (32 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Revija za socijalnu politiku are Predrag Bejaković, Siniša Zrinščak, Teo Matković, Ivana Dobrotić, Valerija Botrić, Jana Mali, Marina Ajduković, Aleksander Aristovnik, Željka Kamenov and Zvonimir Galić.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Revija za socijalnu politiku

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Revija za socijalnu politiku. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Revija za socijalnu politiku.

Countries where authors publish in Revija za socijalnu politiku

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Revija za socijalnu politiku. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Revija za socijalnu politiku with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Revija za socijalnu politiku more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025