China Finance Review International

365 papers and 4.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 365 papers published in China Finance Review International in the last decades have received a total of 4.1k indexed citations. Papers published in China Finance Review International usually cover Finance (228 papers), Economics and Econometrics (211 papers) and Accounting (160 papers) specifically the topics of Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (134 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (119 papers) and Market Dynamics and Volatility (84 papers). The most active scholars publishing in China Finance Review International are Thomas C. Chiang, Ahmad Raza Bilal, Sajid Iqbal, P. Raghavendra Rau, Sumit Agarwal, Junxiong Fang, Nimesh Salike, Junli Yu, Ehsan Rasoulinezhad and Chuc Anh Tu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in China Finance Review International

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in China Finance Review International. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in China Finance Review International.

Countries where authors publish in China Finance Review International

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in China Finance Review International. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in China Finance Review International with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites China Finance Review International more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025