China Finance Review International

5.8k citations
416 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

  • Finance top 5%
    • Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
    • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
  • Accounting top 5%
    • Corporate Finance and Governance
    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance

Papers in

    • Financial Markets and Investment Strategies 137
    • Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling 64
    • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency 47
    • Corporate Finance and Governance 122
    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 54

China Finance Review International

375 papers receiving 5.6k citations

Peers

China Finance Review International
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Finance 1.8k
  • Accounting 1.9k
  • Economics and Econometrics 3.1k
  • Strategy and Management 1.1k
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 478
Replace Business Economics with:
Business Economics United States
German Economic Review Germany
The Review of Corporate Finance Studies United States
Journal of Economics Finance and Administrative Science Colombia
International Journal of Managerial Finance United States
Journal of Applied Economics United States
International Review of Finance Australia
Global Economic Review South Korea
Review of Accounting and Finance United States
Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies South Korea
China Finance Review International relative to Business Economics United States Business Economics's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.9×
Business Economics · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in China Finance Review International

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in China Finance Review International. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in China Finance Review International with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites China Finance Review International more than expected).

Fields of papers published in China Finance Review International

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in China Finance Review International. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in China Finance Review International.

About China Finance Review International

The 416 papers published in China Finance Review International in the last decades have received a total of 5.8k indexed citations . Papers published in China Finance Review International usually cover Finance (239 papers), Accounting (168 papers), Economics and Econometrics (228 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (36 papers) and Strategy and Management (62 papers) specifically the topics of Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (137 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (122 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (92 papers), Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (64 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (54 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (47 papers), Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (43 papers) and Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (33 papers). The most active scholars publishing in China Finance Review International are Thomas Chi-Nan Chiang, P. Raghavendra Rau, Sumit D. Agarwal, Nimesh Salike, Junxiong Fang, Sajid Iqbal, Ahmad Raza Bilal, Ehsan Rasoulinezhad, Muhammad Azhar Khalil and Junli Jerry Yu.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact