Countries where authors publish in Religion & Education
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Religion & Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Religion & Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Religion & Education more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Religion & Education
This network shows the impact of papers published in Religion & Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Religion & Education.
About Religion & Education
The 416 papers published in Religion & Education in the last decades have received a total of 1.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Religion & Education usually cover Health (94 papers), Education (304 papers), Religious studies (31 papers), Sociology and Political Science (196 papers) and Demography (45 papers) specifically the topics of Religious Education and Schools (229 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (94 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (90 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (80 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (74 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (51 papers), Diverse Education Studies and Reforms (26 papers) and Jewish Identity and Society (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Religion & Education are Alyssa N. Bryant, Robert Jackson, Wolfram Weiße, Jenny Berglund, Leni Franken, Tim Jensen, Robert J. Nash, J. Luke Wood, Adriel A. Hilton and Charles J. Russo.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.