Contemporary Islam

358 papers and 2.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 358 papers published in Contemporary Islam in the last decades have received a total of 2.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Contemporary Islam usually cover Sociology and Political Science (284 papers), Political Science and International Relations (180 papers) and Education (60 papers) specifically the topics of Politics of Islamic Reform in Middle East (109 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (75 papers) and Education and Islamic Studies (55 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contemporary Islam are Daniel Martin Varisco, Noorhaidi Hasan, Asifa Siraj, Andrew Kam-Tuck Yip, Arthur Saniotis, William O Beeman, Ahmad Najib Burhani, Bryan S. Turner, Berna Turam and Samuli Schielke.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Contemporary Islam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary Islam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary Islam.

Countries where authors publish in Contemporary Islam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary Islam. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary Islam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary Islam more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025