Quality - Access to Success

390 papers and 670 indexed citations i.

About

The 390 papers published in Quality - Access to Success in the last decades have received a total of 670 indexed citations. Papers published in Quality - Access to Success usually cover Accounting (80 papers), Sociology and Political Science (65 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (55 papers) specifically the topics of Employee Performance and Management (40 papers), Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (39 papers) and SMEs Development and Digital Marketing (39 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Quality - Access to Success are Filippo Sgroi, Riccardo Testa, Salvatore Tudisca, Anna Maria Di Trapani, Giuseppina Migliore, Emanuele Schimmenti, Narcisa Roxana Moşteanu, Giovanni Dara Guccione, Valeria Borsellino and Giorgio Schifani.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Quality - Access to Success

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Quality - Access to Success. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Quality - Access to Success.

Countries where authors publish in Quality - Access to Success

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Quality - Access to Success. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Quality - Access to Success with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quality - Access to Success more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025