Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management

9.7k citations
436 papers · · active since 2004

Impact in

    • Accounting and Organizational Management
  • Accounting top 5%
    • Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting
    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
    • Accounting and Financial Management

Papers in

Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management

427 papers receiving 9k citations

Peers

Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • Management Information Systems 3.5k
  • Accounting 1.9k
  • Strategy and Management 1.8k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.1k
  • Public Administration 433
Replace Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change with:
Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change United Kingdom
Journal of Management Accounting Research United States
Journal of Management Control Germany
Behavioral Research in Accounting United States
International Journal of Accounting Information Systems United States
Journal of managerial issues United States
Baltic Journal of Management China
International Journal of Business Performance Management United Kingdom
Management Review Quarterly Germany
Research in the sociology of organizations United Kingdom
Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management relative to Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change United Kingdom Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management.

About Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management

The 436 papers published in Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management in the last decades have received a total of 9.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management usually cover Management Information Systems (251 papers), Accounting (111 papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (70 papers), Public Administration (22 papers) and Strategy and Management (48 papers) specifically the topics of Accounting and Organizational Management (237 papers), Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting (56 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (52 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (45 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (34 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Applications (28 papers), Business Strategies and Management Research (22 papers) and Public Policy and Administration Research (21 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management are John Dumay, Sandy Q. Qu, Ramji Balakrishnan, Juhani Vaivio, Robert William Scapens, Lee David Parker, Hanne S. O. Nørreklit, Chris Akroyd, Sara J. Nadin and João Alves Ribeiro.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact