Anuario de Psicología Jurídica

266 papers and 1.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 266 papers published in Anuario de Psicología Jurídica in the last decades have received a total of 1.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Anuario de Psicología Jurídica usually cover Clinical Psychology (105 papers), Sociology and Political Science (100 papers) and Law (69 papers) specifically the topics of Intimate Partner and Family Violence (46 papers), Criminal Justice and Penology (43 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (40 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Anuario de Psicología Jurídica are Antonio L. Manzanero, José Manuel Muñoz, Enrique Echeburúa, Pedro J. Amor, M. Ángeles López-González, Esperanza Bosch Fiol, Fernando Rubio‐Garay, Miguel Ángel Carrasco, Victòria Aurora Ferrer Pérez and Izaskun Ibabe.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Anuario de Psicología Jurídica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Anuario de Psicología Jurídica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Anuario de Psicología Jurídica.

Countries where authors publish in Anuario de Psicología Jurídica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Anuario de Psicología Jurídica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Anuario de Psicología Jurídica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anuario de Psicología Jurídica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025