Frederic Wakeman

1.8k citations
46 papers · 1.0k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Frederic Wakeman

40 papers receiving 605 citations

Peers

Frederic Wakeman
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Cultural Studies 267
  • Anthropology 177
  • Sociology and Political Science 762
  • Political Science and International Relations 277
  • History and Philosophy of Science 25
Replace Philip A. Kuhn with:
Philip A. Kuhn United States
Evelyn S. Rawski United States
Edgar Wickberg Canada
Timothy Brook Canada
Romeyn Taylor United States
Joseph W. Esherick United States
Gale Stokes United States
M. C. Ricklefs Australia
Mark Elliott United Kingdom
John Breuilly United Kingdom
Frederic Wakeman relative to Philip A. Kuhn United States Philip A. Kuhn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Philip A. Kuhn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederic Wakeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederic Wakeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederic Wakeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederic Wakeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederic Wakeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederic Wakeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederic Wakeman. The network helps show where Frederic Wakeman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Frederic Wakeman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederic Wakeman Line = papers co-authored together Frederic Wakeman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993118
2 1988117
3 197898
4
The Fall of Imperial China
197574
5 198662
6
Modern East Asia : essays in interpretation
197056
7 197553
8 199247
9 199642
10 197340
11 199728
12 197825
13 199725
14 198423
15 197620
16 199619
17 200316
18 199614
19 198813
20 197613

About Frederic Wakeman

Frederic Wakeman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (16 papers), Japanese History and Culture (5 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (4 papers), Asian Studies and History (2 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (2 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper), Medical History and Research (1 paper) and Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (267 citations), Anthropology (177 citations), Sociology and Political Science (762 citations), Political Science and International Relations (277 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (25 citations). Frederic Wakeman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and China. Frequent co-authors include Philip A. Kuhn, Charles O. Hucker, James B. Crowley, Parks M. Coble, Alvin P. Cohen, David L. Wank, John E. Wills, Angela Zito, H. Kahn and Xi Wang. Their work appears in journals such as The China Quarterly, The American Historical Review, The Journal of Asian Studies, Modern China and Representations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact