Countries where authors publish in Quaestiones Geographicae
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Quaestiones Geographicae. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Quaestiones Geographicae with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quaestiones Geographicae more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Quaestiones Geographicae
This network shows the impact of papers published in Quaestiones Geographicae. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Quaestiones Geographicae.
About Quaestiones Geographicae
The 648 papers published in Quaestiones Geographicae in the last decades have received a total of 6.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Quaestiones Geographicae usually cover Urban Studies (75 papers), Geology (49 papers), Earth-Surface Processes (58 papers), Geography, Planning and Development (49 papers) and Atmospheric Science (64 papers) specifically the topics of Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation (42 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (31 papers), Climate variability and models (29 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (29 papers), Coastal and Marine Dynamics (26 papers), Urbanism, Landscape, and Tourism Studies (25 papers), Rural development and sustainability (23 papers) and Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Quaestiones Geographicae are Jan Hauke, Tomasz M. Kossowski, Muh Aris Marfai, Zbigniew Zwoliński, Olav Slaymaker, Olaf Kühne, Dariusz Wrzesiński, Clifford D. Ollier, Manuela Pelfini and Irene Maria Bollati.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.