Przegląd Geograficzny

353 papers and 1.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 353 papers published in Przegląd Geograficzny in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Przegląd Geograficzny usually cover Water Science and Technology (90 papers), Economics and Econometrics (83 papers) and Urban Studies (74 papers) specifically the topics of Integrated Water Resources Management (87 papers), Polish socio-economic development (76 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (62 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Przegląd Geograficzny are Przemysław Śleszyński, Jerzy Bański, Tomasz Komornicki, Mirosław Miȩtus, Arkadiusz M. Tomczyk, Urszula Myga-Piątek, P. Eberhardt, Krzysztof Błażejczyk, Zbigniew Taylor and Marcin Stępniak.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Przegląd Geograficzny

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Przegląd Geograficzny. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Przegląd Geograficzny.

Countries where authors publish in Przegląd Geograficzny

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Przegląd Geograficzny. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Przegląd Geograficzny with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Przegląd Geograficzny more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025