Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open

47.8k citations
6.7k papers · · active since 2013

Impact in

    • Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
    • Dermatologic Treatments and Research
  • Surgery top 2%
    • Breast Implant and Reconstruction
    • Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
    • Body Contouring and Surgery
    • Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques

Papers in

  • Surgery 3.8k
    • Breast Implant and Reconstruction 1.2k
    • Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques 1.2k
    • Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques 322
    • Body Contouring and Surgery 276
    • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 257
    • Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques 430

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open

5.5k papers receiving 44.9k citations

Peers

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Comparison fields: 5 of 198
  • Dermatology 5.4k
  • Surgery 23.3k
  • Rehabilitation 1.8k
  • Health Informatics 633
  • Transplantation 347
Replace Ophthalmology with:
Ophthalmology United States
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery United Kingdom
Lara D. Veeken United Kingdom
Journal of Korean Medical Science South Korea
Medicina Romania
Clinical Rheumatology China
Chinese Medical Journal China
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine United States
Journal of International Medical Research China
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism United States
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open relative to Ophthalmology United States Ophthalmology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Ophthalmology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open.

About Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open

The 6.7k papers published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open in the last decades have received a total of 47.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open usually cover Surgery (3.8k papers), Dermatology (612 papers), Rehabilitation (219 papers), Health Informatics (52 papers) and Transplantation (70 papers) specifically the topics of Breast Implant and Reconstruction (1.2k papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (1.2k papers), Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (430 papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (322 papers), Body Contouring and Surgery (276 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (257 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (215 papers) and Cleft Lip and Palate Research (199 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open are Eric C Swanson, Jeffrey E. Janis, Rod J. Rohrich, Rei Ogawa, Maurice Y. Nahabedian, Donald H. Lalonde, Kyle R. Eberlin, Sumeet Sorel Teotia, Anna R. Schoenbrunner and Nolan S. Karp.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact