Kyle R. Eberlin

167 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Kyle R. Eberlin
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 138
  • Rehabilitation 154
  • Surgery 877
  • Transplantation 51
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 291
Replace Oluyinka O. Olutoye with:
Oluyinka O. Olutoye United States
J. Bradford Rice United States
Matthew B. Klein United States
John A. Boswick United States
Warren C. Hammert United States
Glória Pelizzo Italy
S.T. O’Sullivan Ireland
Uta Meyding‐Lamadé Germany
Filippo Palermo Italy
Sanjay Gupta India
Kyle R. Eberlin relative to Oluyinka O. Olutoye United States Oluyinka O. Olutoye's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.2×
Oluyinka O. Olutoye · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kyle R. Eberlin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle R. Eberlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle R. Eberlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle R. Eberlin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle R. Eberlin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle R. Eberlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle R. Eberlin. The network helps show where Kyle R. Eberlin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kyle R. Eberlin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kyle R. Eberlin Line = papers co-authored together Kyle R. Eberlin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 187 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008304
2 2018136
3 200668
4 201762
5 202258
6 202056
7 200756
8 202047
9 200843
10 201441
11 201338
12 202037
13 202036
14 201335
15 202234
16 201933
17 201632
18 201832
19 201929
20 202329

About Kyle R. Eberlin

Kyle R. Eberlin is a scholar working on Surgery, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 187 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (31 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (29 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (21 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (17 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (14 papers), Peripheral Nerve Disorders (10 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (9 papers) and Bone fractures and treatments (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (138 citations), Rehabilitation (154 citations), Surgery (877 citations), Transplantation (51 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (291 citations). Kyle R. Eberlin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ivica Ducic, William G. Austen, Jonathan Lans, Ian L. Valerio, Michael C. McCormack, Neal C. Chen, Jonathan M. Winograd, Hamit Soner Tatlıdede, Neal C. Chen and Suzanne C. Wilkens. Their work appears in journals such as Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, The Journal Of Hand Surgery, Hand, Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery and Hand Clinics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact