This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Fluid Dynamics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Fluid Dynamics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fluid Dynamics more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Fluid Dynamics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Fluid Dynamics.
About Fluid Dynamics
The 5.5k papers published in Fluid Dynamics in the last decades have received a total of 26.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Fluid Dynamics usually cover Computational Mechanics (3.4k papers), Applied Mathematics (1.1k papers), Ocean Engineering (988 papers), Earth-Surface Processes (365 papers) and Aerospace Engineering (1.2k papers) specifically the topics of Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (1.8k papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (1.0k papers), Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (955 papers), Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (714 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis (368 papers), Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics (333 papers), Combustion and flame dynamics (260 papers) and Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering (256 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Fluid Dynamics are E. E. Meshkov, O. V. Voinov, Е. М. Шахов, V. Ya. Shkadov, V. Ya. Neiland, A. Y. Klimenko, А. Н. Осипцов, G. G. Tsypkin, Anatoly I. Ruban and В. А. Рыков.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.