Prospects

17.7k citations
1.8k papers · · active since 1970

Impact in

  • Education top 2%
    • Education during COVID-19 pandemic
    • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
    • Inclusive Education and Diversity
    • Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
    • School Choice and Performance
    • Global Education and Multiculturalism
    • Global Educational Policies and Reforms
    • Higher Education Governance and Development

Papers in

    • Global Education Systems and Policies 179
    • Education Pedagogy and Practices 93
    • African Education and Politics 91
    • School Choice and Performance 81
    • Education Systems and Policy 77
    • Global Education and Multiculturalism 71
    • Global Educational Policies and Reforms 295
    • Higher Education Governance and Development 72

Prospects

1.5k papers receiving 14.4k citations

Peers

Prospects
Comparison fields: 5 of 179
  • Education 9.9k
  • Political Science and International Relations 2.8k
  • Safety Research 814
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 909
  • Linguistics and Language 303
Replace The Qualitative Report with:
The Qualitative Report United States
International Review of Education United States
Qualitative Research United Kingdom
The Educational Forum United States
International Journal of Educational Management United States
International Journal of Lifelong Education United Kingdom
Educational Philosophy and Theory Australia
History of Education Quarterly United States
Educational Theory United States
Forum qualitative Sozialforschung Germany
Prospects relative to The Qualitative Report United States The Qualitative Report's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
The Qualitative Report · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Prospects

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Prospects. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Prospects with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Prospects more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Prospects

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Prospects. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Prospects.

About Prospects

The 1.8k papers published in Prospects in the last decades have received a total of 17.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Prospects usually cover Education (1.1k papers), Political Science and International Relations (444 papers), Development (42 papers), Safety Research (105 papers) and Linguistics and Language (43 papers) specifically the topics of Global Educational Policies and Reforms (295 papers), Global Education Systems and Policies (179 papers), Education Pedagogy and Practices (93 papers), African Education and Politics (91 papers), School Choice and Performance (81 papers), Education Systems and Policy (77 papers), Higher Education Governance and Development (72 papers) and Global Education and Multiculturalism (71 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Prospects are Sir John Daniel, Paulo Freiré, Mel Ainscow, Yong Zhao, Philip G. Altbach, Stephen P. Heyneman, Clementina Acedo, Jandhyalá B. G. Tilak, Emiliano Bosio and Harry Anthony Patrinos.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact