Countries where authors publish in Clinical Dysmorphology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Dysmorphology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Dysmorphology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Dysmorphology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Clinical Dysmorphology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Dysmorphology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Dysmorphology.
About Clinical Dysmorphology
The 1.5k papers published in Clinical Dysmorphology in the last decades have received a total of 11.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Clinical Dysmorphology usually cover Developmental Biology (143 papers), Genetics (869 papers), Genetics (197 papers), Urology (72 papers) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (218 papers) specifically the topics of Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (241 papers), Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments (161 papers), Connective tissue disorders research (157 papers), Congenital limb and hand anomalies (143 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (123 papers), Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (111 papers), Cleft Lip and Palate Research (109 papers) and Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies (109 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Dysmorphology are Ahmad I. Alomari, M Baraitser, Helga V. Toriello, Alan Fryer, William Reardon, J. M. Cobben, Dian Donnai, Jill Clayton‐Smith, Robin M. Winter and L.I. Al-Gazali.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.