Countries where authors publish in Clinical Dysmorphology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Dysmorphology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Dysmorphology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Dysmorphology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Clinical Dysmorphology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Dysmorphology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Dysmorphology.
About Clinical Dysmorphology
The 1.5k papers published in Clinical Dysmorphology in the last decades have received a total of 12.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Clinical Dysmorphology usually cover Developmental Biology (150 papers), Genetics (888 papers), Genetics (204 papers), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (225 papers) and Urology (72 papers) specifically the topics of Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (245 papers), Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments (166 papers), Connective tissue disorders research (161 papers), Congenital limb and hand anomalies (150 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (127 papers), Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (114 papers), Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies (114 papers) and Cleft Lip and Palate Research (113 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Dysmorphology are Ahmad I. Alomari, M Baraitser, Helga V. Toriello, Alan Fryer, William Reardon, J. M. Cobben, Dian Donnai, L.I. Al-Gazali, Robin M. Winter and Jill Clayton‐Smith.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.