Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

67.2k citations
690 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

677 papers receiving 64.9k citations

Peers

Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Comparison fields: 5 of 202
  • Spectroscopy 31.5k
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 16.0k
  • Biophysics 5.6k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 11.8k
  • Materials Chemistry 16.3k
Replace Journal of Magnetic Resonance Series A with:
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Series A United States
Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data United States
Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics United States
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Series B United States
Annual reports on NMR spectroscopy United Kingdom
Advances In Physics United Kingdom
Computers in Physics United States
Applied Spectroscopy Reviews United States
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science United States
Progress in Energy and Combustion Science United States
Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy relative to Journal of Magnetic Resonance Series A United States Journal of Magnetic Resonance Series A's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Series A · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.

About Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

The 690 papers published in Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in the last decades have received a total of 67.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy usually cover Spectroscopy (464 papers), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (269 papers), Biophysics (59 papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (198 papers) and Materials Chemistry (160 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (399 papers), NMR spectroscopy and applications (268 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (178 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (98 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (94 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (77 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (65 papers) and Electron Spin Resonance Studies (58 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy are Michael Sattler, Charles S. Johnson, Peter Stilbs, Teresa W.‐M. Fan, Malcolm H. Levitt, V. F. Bystrov, Poul Erik Hansen, Jeremy K. Nicholson, Geoffrey Bodenhausen and Alex D. Bain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact