This map shows the geographic impact of research published in 地理科学进展. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in 地理科学进展 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites 地理科学进展 more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in 地理科学进展. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in 地理科学进展.
About 地理科学进展
The 2.7k papers published in 地理科学进展 in the last decades have received a total of 11.9k indexed citations . Papers published in 地理科学进展 usually cover Global and Planetary Change (670 papers), Transportation (189 papers), Urban Studies (183 papers), Economics and Econometrics (628 papers) and Geography, Planning and Development (130 papers) specifically the topics of Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (444 papers), Environmental Changes in China (341 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (304 papers), Regional Development and Environment (279 papers), Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research (131 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (121 papers), Regional Economic and Spatial Analysis (113 papers) and Urban Transport and Accessibility (97 papers). The most active scholars publishing in 地理科学进展 are Hualou Long, Chuanglin Fang, Yunlong Cai, Wang Zhong, Yeqing Cheng, Pingjun Sun, LU Yu-qi, Zhou Chenghu, Jian Peng and Chunliang Xiu.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.