Socio-Economic Planning Sciences

2.5k papers and 42.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.5k papers published in Socio-Economic Planning Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 42.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Socio-Economic Planning Sciences usually cover Economics and Econometrics (958 papers), Management Science and Operations Research (671 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (316 papers) specifically the topics of Efficiency Analysis Using DEA (338 papers), Facility Location and Emergency Management (211 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (176 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Socio-Economic Planning Sciences are Ali Emrouznejad, Necmi K. Avkiran, Guo-liang Yang, George W. Torrance, Shawna Grosskopf, Rolf Färe, Juri Pill, Hirofumi Fukuyama, Thomas L. Saaty and William Weber.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Socio-Economic Planning Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.

Countries where authors publish in Socio-Economic Planning Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Socio-Economic Planning Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Socio-Economic Planning Sciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025