Problems of Post-Communism

7.5k citations
1.0k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Electoral Systems and Political Participation
    • Russia and Soviet political economy
    • International Relations and Foreign Policy
    • Populism, Right-Wing Movements
    • Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
    • European Union Policy and Governance

Papers in

    • Russia and Soviet political economy 173
    • Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics 121
    • European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies 72
    • International Relations and Foreign Policy 72
    • European Politics and Security 65
    • Electoral Systems and Political Participation 57

Problems of Post-Communism

749 papers receiving 5.5k citations

Peers

Problems of Post-Communism
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • General Energy 313
  • Political Science and International Relations 4.8k
  • Sociology and Political Science 4.3k
  • Development 257
  • Communication 485
Replace Turkish Studies with:
Turkish Studies Türkiye
The Middle East Journal United States
Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies Türkiye
Post-Soviet Affairs United States
Central Asian Survey United States
Middle East Policy United States
European Security United Kingdom
Mediterranean Politics United Kingdom
Orbis United States
Journal of Strategic Studies United States
Problems of Post-Communism relative to Turkish Studies Türkiye Turkish Studies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Turkish Studies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Problems of Post-Communism

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Problems of Post-Communism. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Problems of Post-Communism with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Problems of Post-Communism more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Problems of Post-Communism

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Problems of Post-Communism. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Problems of Post-Communism.

About Problems of Post-Communism

The 1.0k papers published in Problems of Post-Communism in the last decades have received a total of 7.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Problems of Post-Communism usually cover General Energy (45 papers), Political Science and International Relations (634 papers), Archeology (11 papers), Sociology and Political Science (392 papers) and Communication (34 papers) specifically the topics of Russia and Soviet political economy (173 papers), Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics (121 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (98 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (80 papers), European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies (72 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (72 papers), European Politics and Security (65 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (57 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Problems of Post-Communism are Andreï P. Tsygankov, Vlastimil Havlík, Marlène Laruelle, Taras Kuzio, Zsolt Enyedi, Attila Ágh, Расма Карклинс, Grigorii V. Golosov, Andrey Makarychev and Anastassia Obydenkova.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact