Central Asian Survey

1.3k papers and 8.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Central Asian Survey in the last decades have received a total of 8.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Central Asian Survey usually cover Political Science and International Relations (926 papers), Sociology and Political Science (636 papers) and Anthropology (238 papers) specifically the topics of Soviet and Russian History (461 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (211 papers) and China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations (186 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Central Asian Survey are Natalie Koch, Deniz Kandiyoti, John Heathershaw, Madeleine Reeves, Roy Allison, Adeeb Khalid, Adrian Zenz, Stephen Blank, Julie George and Dru C. Gladney.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Central Asian Survey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Central Asian Survey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Central Asian Survey.

Countries where authors publish in Central Asian Survey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Central Asian Survey. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Central Asian Survey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Central Asian Survey more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025