Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences

13.8k citations
982 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
    • MRI in cancer diagnosis
    • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
    • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
    • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Neurology top 10%
    • Vestibular and auditory disorders

Papers in

    • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications 455
    • MRI in cancer diagnosis 255
    • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications 201
    • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging 65
    • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications 61

Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences

920 papers receiving 13.5k citations

Peers

Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 176
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 7.5k
  • Neurology 1.3k
  • Neurology 2.0k
  • Sensory Systems 643
  • Hepatology 887
Replace Comprehensive physiology with:
Comprehensive physiology United States
Progress in molecular biology and translational science United States
Advances in immunology United States
Seminars in Immunopathology United States
Angiogenesis United States
Seminars in Ultrasound CT and MRI United States
Growth Factors United States
Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine United States
Science Immunology United States
Critical Reviews in Immunology United States
Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences relative to Comprehensive physiology United States Comprehensive physiology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Comprehensive physiology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences.

About Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences

The 982 papers published in Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 13.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences usually cover Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (636 papers), Neurology (61 papers), Neurology (106 papers), Hepatology (49 papers) and Reproductive Medicine (42 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (455 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (255 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (201 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (90 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (65 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (61 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (56 papers) and Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (56 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences are Shinji Naganawa, Hisashi Kawai, Toshiaki Taoka, Michihiko Sone, Tsutomu Nakashima, Masahiro Yamazaki, Toshiki Nakane, Shigeki Aoki, Kiminori Bokura and Utaroh Motosugi.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact