Politics and the Life Sciences

886 papers and 4.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 886 papers published in Politics and the Life Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 4.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Politics and the Life Sciences usually cover Sociology and Political Science (255 papers), Political Science and International Relations (96 papers) and Molecular Biology (89 papers) specifically the topics of Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (63 papers), Biological Agents for Bioterrorism (61 papers) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (51 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Politics and the Life Sciences are Carol Barner-Barry, Gary R. Johnson, Ken Daniels, Allan Mazur, Kevin MacDonald, Robert H. Blank, Nabin Baral, Joel T. Heinen, Bobbi S. Low and Peter A. Corning.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Politics and the Life Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Politics and the Life Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Politics and the Life Sciences.

Countries where authors publish in Politics and the Life Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Politics and the Life Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Politics and the Life Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Politics and the Life Sciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025