Plasma devices and operations

339 papers and 1.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 339 papers published in Plasma devices and operations in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Plasma devices and operations usually cover Materials Chemistry (152 papers), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (133 papers) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (99 papers) specifically the topics of Materials Challenges in Fusion Energy Research (119 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (116 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (65 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Plasma devices and operations are В. Ф. Тарасенко, Sergei I Yakovlenko, А.V. Vertkov, V.A. Evtikhin, K.Yu. Vukolov, I.E. Lyublinski, М. И. Ломаев, A.S. Pokrovsky, I. D. Kostyrya and Д. В. Рыбка.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Plasma devices and operations

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Plasma devices and operations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Plasma devices and operations.

Countries where authors publish in Plasma devices and operations

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Plasma devices and operations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Plasma devices and operations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Plasma devices and operations more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025