Islamic Law and Society

398 papers and 1.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 398 papers published in Islamic Law and Society in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Islamic Law and Society usually cover Political Science and International Relations (356 papers), Sociology and Political Science (166 papers) and Accounting (141 papers) specifically the topics of Politics of Islamic Reform in Middle East (330 papers), Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (140 papers) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (105 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Islamic Law and Society are Wael B. Hallaq, Boğaç A. Ergene, R. Michael Feener, Aharon Layish, Devin J. Stewart, Moch Nur Ichwan, Dror Ze’evi, Jonathan P. Berkey, Yossef Rapoport and Gabriel Baer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Islamic Law and Society

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Islamic Law and Society. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Islamic Law and Society.

Countries where authors publish in Islamic Law and Society

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Islamic Law and Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Islamic Law and Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Islamic Law and Society more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025