Bio-Design and Manufacturing

8.6k citations
386 papers · · active since 2018

Impact in

    • 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
    • Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
    • Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
    • Soft Robotics and Applications
    • Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications

Papers in

    • 3D Printing in Biomedical Research 134
    • Bone Tissue Engineering Materials 57
    • Soft Robotics and Applications 18
    • Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials 15
    • Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications 12

Bio-Design and Manufacturing

353 papers receiving 8.5k citations

Peers

Bio-Design and Manufacturing
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
  • Biomedical Engineering 4.7k
  • Molecular Medicine 548
  • Biomaterials 751
  • Automotive Engineering 513
  • Pharmaceutical Science 195
Replace Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering with:
Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering United States
Bioprinting United States
International Journal of Biomaterials United States
Nano Convergence South Korea
Advanced Biosystems United States
npj Flexible Electronics China
APL Bioengineering United States
Smart Materials in Medicine China
Journal of Tissue Engineering United Kingdom
Progress in Biomaterials Iran
Bio-Design and Manufacturing relative to Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering United States Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Bio-Design and Manufacturing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Bio-Design and Manufacturing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Bio-Design and Manufacturing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bio-Design and Manufacturing more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Bio-Design and Manufacturing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Bio-Design and Manufacturing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Bio-Design and Manufacturing.

About Bio-Design and Manufacturing

The 386 papers published in Bio-Design and Manufacturing in the last decades have received a total of 8.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Bio-Design and Manufacturing usually cover Biomedical Engineering (238 papers), Biomaterials (30 papers), Molecular Medicine (15 papers), Automotive Engineering (20 papers) and Rehabilitation (10 papers) specifically the topics of 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (134 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (57 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (29 papers), Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies (20 papers), Soft Robotics and Applications (18 papers), Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications (15 papers), Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (15 papers) and Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (12 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Bio-Design and Manufacturing are Seeram Ramakrishna, Erfan Rezvani Ghomi, Yu Shrike Zhang, Yong He, Saeid Alipour, Nazatul Liana Sukiman, Masoud Sarraf, Liang Ma, Subha Narayan Rath and Ali Khademhosseini.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact