Phytomedicine Plus

731 papers and 4.2k indexed citations

About

The 731 papers published in Phytomedicine Plus in the last decades have received a total of 4.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Phytomedicine Plus usually cover Plant Science (221 papers), Molecular Biology (202 papers) and Complementary and alternative medicine (158 papers) specifically the topics of Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (114 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (95 papers) and Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (77 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Phytomedicine Plus are Yasser Fakri Mustafa, Adel A. Gomaa, Marwa A. A. Fayed, Becky Robert, Subramaniam Sadhasivam, Sabulal Baby, Murugan Prasathkumar, Dhrisya Chenthamara, Anil John Johnson and Sidharth Mehan.

In The Last Decade

Phytomedicine Plus

594 papers receiving 4.1k citations

Fields of papers published in Phytomedicine Plus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Phytomedicine Plus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Phytomedicine Plus.

Countries where authors publish in Phytomedicine Plus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Phytomedicine Plus. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Phytomedicine Plus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phytomedicine Plus more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026