Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences

698 papers and 4.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 698 papers published in Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 4.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences usually cover Surgery (270 papers), Neurology (264 papers) and Epidemiology (163 papers) specifically the topics of Meningioma and schwannoma management (118 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (105 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (104 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences are Corrado Iaccarino, Carlotta Morselli, Federico Nicolosi, Hugues Duffau, Massimiliano Visocchi, Waleed Brinjikji, Alistair Nichol, Giuseppe Lanzino, James R. van Dellen and Cesar V. Borlongan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025