Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation

921 papers and 9.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 921 papers published in Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation in the last decades have received a total of 9.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation usually cover Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (201 papers), Physiology (164 papers) and Rehabilitation (131 papers) specifically the topics of Sports injuries and prevention (115 papers), Sports Performance and Training (95 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (90 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation are Hyo‐Bum Kwak, Seung‐Soo Baek, Hyunseok Jee, Yong‐Seok Jee, Chang‐Ju Kim, Mal‐Soon Shin, Tae-Woon Kim, Haemi Jee, Yun-Hee Sung and Jooyoung Kim.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025