Philosophia Reformata

349 papers and 580 indexed citations i.

About

The 349 papers published in Philosophia Reformata in the last decades have received a total of 580 indexed citations. Papers published in Philosophia Reformata usually cover Philosophy (105 papers), Sociology and Political Science (67 papers) and History (34 papers) specifically the topics of Reformed Theology and Governance (53 papers), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (33 papers) and Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (29 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Philosophia Reformata are Herman Dooyeweerd, Henk Jochemsen, Marc J. de Vries, Paul Marshall, Lambert Zuidervaart, R. van Woudenberg, Maarten Verkerk, Andrew Basden, Jonathan Chaplin and Ernst M. Conradie.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Philosophia Reformata

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Philosophia Reformata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Philosophia Reformata.

Countries where authors publish in Philosophia Reformata

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Philosophia Reformata. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Philosophia Reformata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philosophia Reformata more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025