International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention
134 papers
receiving
643 citations
Peers
International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine250
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism64
Complementary and alternative medicine30
Nephrology24
Family Practice6
Replace Comprehensive Therapy with:
Comprehensive TherapyUnited States
Ochsner JournalUnited States
ImmunoTargets and TherapyChina
Journal of Lipid and AtherosclerosisSouth Korea
FUKUSHIMA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCEJapan
Oncology ReviewsUnited States
F1000 Medicine ReportsUnited States
The Open Respiratory Medicine JournalUnited States
Precision Clinical MedicineChina
Advances in HematologyUnited States
International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Preventionrelative toComprehensive TherapyUnited StatesComprehensive Therapy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×45×
Comprehensive Therapy · 1×
×2.1250/121CCM
×0.564/125EDM
×0.930/35CAM
×1.324/18NEPHR
×1.06/6FP
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention more than expected).
Fields of papers published in International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention
This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention.
About International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention
The 292 papers published in International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention in the last decades have received a total of 900 indexed citations . Papers published in International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (82 papers), Family Practice (5 papers), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (13 papers), Complementary and alternative medicine (6 papers) and Nephrology (5 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac Health and Mental Health (14 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (13 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (10 papers), Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (10 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (9 papers), Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity (9 papers), Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (7 papers) and Diabetes Treatment and Management (7 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention are Ulrik Wisløff, Jon Magne Letnes, Bjarne M. Nes, Salim S. Virani, Carl J. Lavie, Zhen Wang, Yusuf Kamran Qadeer, George D. Thurston, Richard B. Hayes and Kazi Mohammed Didarul Islam.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.