Asia Pacific Law Review

309 papers and 583 indexed citations i.

About

The 309 papers published in Asia Pacific Law Review in the last decades have received a total of 583 indexed citations. Papers published in Asia Pacific Law Review usually cover Political Science and International Relations (127 papers), Law (101 papers) and Strategy and Management (86 papers) specifically the topics of International Arbitration and Investment Law (65 papers), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (54 papers) and Legal principles and applications (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asia Pacific Law Review are Haitian Lu, Stephan Ortmann, Philip Norton, Eleonora Rosati, Shen Wei, Xianyi Zeng, James Allan, Johannes Chan, Jianfu Chen and Liming Wang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Asia Pacific Law Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Asia Pacific Law Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asia Pacific Law Review.

Countries where authors publish in Asia Pacific Law Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asia Pacific Law Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asia Pacific Law Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asia Pacific Law Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025