Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

13.1k citations
755 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
    • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Finance top 10%
    • Healthcare Systems and Reforms

Papers in

    • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 98
    • Healthcare Policy and Management 26
    • Healthcare Systems and Reforms 34

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

464 papers receiving 9.6k citations

Peers

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Comparison fields: 5 of 193
  • Economics and Econometrics 2.7k
  • Finance 893
  • General Health Professions 1.7k
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 1.0k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 648
Replace Applied Health Economics and Health Policy with:
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy United Kingdom
Health Economics Review Germany
Research Synthesis Methods United Kingdom
Population Health Metrics United States
Health Risk & Society United Kingdom
Campbell Systematic Reviews United States
Health Policy and Technology United States
Patient United States
Journal of Environmental and Public Health United States
BMC International Health and Human Rights United States
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation relative to Applied Health Economics and Health Policy United Kingdom Applied Health Economics and Health Policy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation.

About Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

The 755 papers published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation in the last decades have received a total of 13.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation usually cover Economics and Econometrics (116 papers), Finance (34 papers), Infectious Diseases (36 papers), General Health Professions (47 papers) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (28 papers) specifically the topics of Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (98 papers), Healthcare Systems and Reforms (34 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (26 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (23 papers), Efficiency Analysis Using DEA (14 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (14 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (13 papers) and Malaria Research and Control (12 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation are Rob Baltussen, Louis Niessen, Raymond Hutubessy, Dan Chisholm, Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer, Benjamin Johns, Clark Paramore, Max Bachmann, Craig Mitton and Cam Donaldson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact