Performance Evaluation

2.1k papers and 26.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Performance Evaluation in the last decades have received a total of 26.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Performance Evaluation usually cover Computer Networks and Communications (1.3k papers), Management Information Systems (972 papers) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (656 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis (953 papers), Network Traffic and Congestion Control (565 papers) and Advanced Wireless Network Optimization (395 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Performance Evaluation are Ho Woo Lee, Kishor S. Trivedi, Leonard Kleinrock, Ward Whitt, W. Fischer, K.S. Meier-Hellstern, Robert Carter, Jennifer Whitehead, Joseph Y.‐T. Leung and Hideaki Takagi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Performance Evaluation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Performance Evaluation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Performance Evaluation.

Countries where authors publish in Performance Evaluation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Performance Evaluation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Performance Evaluation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Performance Evaluation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025