Pakistan Journal of Botany

3.1k papers and 27.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.1k papers published in Pakistan Journal of Botany in the last decades have received a total of 27.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Pakistan Journal of Botany usually cover Plant Science (2.2k papers), Molecular Biology (549 papers) and Agronomy and Crop Science (421 papers) specifically the topics of Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (260 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (217 papers) and Agricultural Science and Fertilization (213 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pakistan Journal of Botany are Muhammad Ashraf, Zabta Khan Shinwari, Habib‐ur‐Rehman Athar, Farrukh Hussain, Muhammad Qaiser, Rahmatullah Qureshi, Asghari Bano, Muhammad Shahbaz, Syed Zahoor Husain and Riffat Naseem Malik.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pakistan Journal of Botany

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pakistan Journal of Botany. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pakistan Journal of Botany.

Countries where authors publish in Pakistan Journal of Botany

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pakistan Journal of Botany. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pakistan Journal of Botany with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pakistan Journal of Botany more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025