Pain Research and Treatment

239 papers and 5.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 239 papers published in Pain Research and Treatment in the last decades have received a total of 5.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Pain Research and Treatment usually cover Pharmacology (94 papers), Physiology (71 papers) and Surgery (56 papers) specifically the topics of Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (82 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (62 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (43 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pain Research and Treatment are Muhammad B. Yunus, Petra Schweinhardt, Victor V. Chaban, George T. Grossberg, Shaheen E Lakhan, Mellar P. Davis, Richard H. Gracely, M. Catherine Bushnell, Marta Čeko and Borja Mugabure Bujedo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pain Research and Treatment

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pain Research and Treatment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pain Research and Treatment.

Countries where authors publish in Pain Research and Treatment

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pain Research and Treatment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pain Research and Treatment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pain Research and Treatment more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025