Netherlands Yearbook for History of Art / Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek Online

479 citations
333 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

Papers in

Netherlands Yearbook for History of Art / Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek Online

94 papers receiving 168 citations

Peers

Netherlands Yearbook for History of Art / Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek Online
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Museology 108
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 101
  • Classics 56
  • History 153
  • Conservation 32
Replace Oud Holland - Journal for Art of the Low Countries with:
Oud Holland - Journal for Art of the Low Countries Belgium
Konsthistorisk tidskrift/Journal of Art History Sweden
Eighteenth-Century Life United States
Architectural History United Kingdom
Cultural and Social History United Kingdom
Historische Anthropologie Germany
Renaissance Drama United States
English Language Notes United States
Theatre Survey United States
Costume United Kingdom
Netherlands Yearbook for History of Art / Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek Online relative to Oud Holland - Journal for Art of the Low Countries Belgium Oud Holland - Journal for Art of the Low Countries's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Oud Holland - Journal for Art of the Low Countries · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Netherlands Yearbook for History of Art / Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek Online

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Netherlands Yearbook for History of Art / Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek Online. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Netherlands Yearbook for History of Art / Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek Online with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Netherlands Yearbook for History of Art / Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek Online more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Netherlands Yearbook for History of Art / Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek Online

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Netherlands Yearbook for History of Art / Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek Online. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Netherlands Yearbook for History of Art / Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek Online.

About Netherlands Yearbook for History of Art / Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek Online

The 333 papers published in Netherlands Yearbook for History of Art / Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek Online in the last decades have received a total of 479 indexed citations . Papers published in Netherlands Yearbook for History of Art / Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek Online usually cover Museology (30 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (39 papers), History (78 papers), Finance (46 papers) and Classics (20 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Influence and Diplomacy (58 papers), Financial Crisis of the 21st Century (46 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (42 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (28 papers), Architecture and Art History Studies (20 papers), Art History and Market Analysis (16 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (16 papers) and Medieval European History and Architecture (12 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Netherlands Yearbook for History of Art / Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek Online are J. R. J. van Asperen de Boer, Sven Dupré, Thijs Weststeijn, Larry Silver, Joanna Woodall, Jochen Becker, J. Bauch, John Michael Montias, Dieter Eckstein and Erwin Panofsky.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact