Historische Anthropologie

336 papers and 507 indexed citations i.

About

The 336 papers published in Historische Anthropologie in the last decades have received a total of 507 indexed citations. Papers published in Historische Anthropologie usually cover Political Science and International Relations (113 papers), History (68 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (67 papers) specifically the topics of European history and politics (61 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (34 papers) and Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (29 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Historische Anthropologie are Bernhard Meyer, J.D. van der Ploeg, Alf Lüdtke, Karl Käser, Hans Medick, Carlo Ginzburg, Reinhard Bernbeck, Jakob Tanner, Maria Todorova and Jeroen Duindam.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Historische Anthropologie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Historische Anthropologie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Historische Anthropologie.

Countries where authors publish in Historische Anthropologie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Historische Anthropologie. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Historische Anthropologie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Historische Anthropologie more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025