Nordic Journal of Botany

3.4k papers and 31.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.4k papers published in Nordic Journal of Botany in the last decades have received a total of 31.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Nordic Journal of Botany usually cover Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.4k papers), Plant Science (2.0k papers) and Molecular Biology (1.4k papers) specifically the topics of Plant Diversity and Evolution (1.2k papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (944 papers) and Plant and animal studies (750 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nordic Journal of Botany are Susanne S. Renner, Wilhelm Barthlott, Kai Larsen, Rolf Dahlgren, Ove Eriksson, Rune Halvorsen Økland, Mats Thulin, Bent Vad Odgaard, Leif Tibell and Signe Frederiksen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nordic Journal of Botany

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nordic Journal of Botany. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nordic Journal of Botany.

Countries where authors publish in Nordic Journal of Botany

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nordic Journal of Botany. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nordic Journal of Botany with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nordic Journal of Botany more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025