Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology

4.4k papers and 112.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.4k papers published in Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology in the last decades have received a total of 112.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology usually cover Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.5k papers), Atmospheric Science (1.8k papers) and Paleontology (1.6k papers) specifically the topics of Plant Diversity and Evolution (2.1k papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (1.7k papers) and Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (1.3k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology are B. van Geel, W. Punt, Thomas N. Taylor, Johanna H.A. van Konijnenburg‐van Cittert, Jan Jansonius, B. E. Balme, Jeffrey M. Osborn, Hermann Behling, Stephen Blackmore and Hans Kerp.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology.

Countries where authors publish in Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025