This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neurogenetics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neurogenetics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neurogenetics more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Neurogenetics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neurogenetics.
About Neurogenetics
The 1.0k papers published in Neurogenetics in the last decades have received a total of 26.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Neurogenetics usually cover Neurology (165 papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (344 papers), Neurology (244 papers), Genetics (89 papers) and Molecular Biology (529 papers) specifically the topics of Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (188 papers), Hereditary Neurological Disorders (156 papers), Neurological diseases and metabolism (147 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (138 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (119 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (94 papers), RNA regulation and disease (86 papers) and Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (81 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neurogenetics are Ken Inoue, Manuel B. Graeber, Linda B Moran, Ulrich Müller, Sara Mole, Dawn C. Duke, Hans Hilmar Goebel, Ruth E. Williams, R. K. B. Pearce and Allen D. Roses.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.