Clinical Nutrition ESPEN

2.7k papers and 18.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.7k papers published in Clinical Nutrition ESPEN in the last decades have received a total of 18.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Nutrition ESPEN usually cover Physiology (1.3k papers), Nutrition and Dietetics (845 papers) and Surgery (464 papers) specifically the topics of Nutrition and Health in Aging (953 papers), Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (518 papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (322 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Nutrition ESPEN are Vittorio Emanuele Bianchi, Heitor O. Santos, Masaaki Tokuda, Arshag D. Mooradian, Rodrigo Cauduro Oliveira Macedo, Pedro Marques‐Vidal, Youngyo Kim, Youjin Je, Richard F. Tester and Xin Qi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Nutrition ESPEN

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Nutrition ESPEN. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Nutrition ESPEN.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Nutrition ESPEN

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Nutrition ESPEN. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Nutrition ESPEN with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Nutrition ESPEN more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025