Forum for Modern Language Studies

1.0k papers and 1.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in Forum for Modern Language Studies in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Forum for Modern Language Studies usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (293 papers), Sociology and Political Science (119 papers) and Language and Linguistics (119 papers) specifically the topics of French Literature and Criticism (44 papers), Spanish Literature and Culture Studies (41 papers) and Early Modern Spanish Literature (36 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Forum for Modern Language Studies are Karin Littáu, Patrick Ryan Williams, David Trotter, Tony Hunt, Albert B. Lord, Markus Seidl, Richard Sheppard, Jocelyn Wogan-Browne, N. Dave and Frederick A. de Armas.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Forum for Modern Language Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Forum for Modern Language Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Forum for Modern Language Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Forum for Modern Language Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Forum for Modern Language Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Forum for Modern Language Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forum for Modern Language Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025