Annual Review of Medicine

2.7k papers and 165.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.7k papers published in Annual Review of Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 165.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Annual Review of Medicine usually cover Surgery (389 papers), Molecular Biology (367 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (300 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (56 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (49 papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (44 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annual Review of Medicine are Michael M. Gottesman, David E. Moller, Michael Brownlee, Joel P. Berger, Judah Folkman, Steven G. Deeks, Herbert L. Needleman, Bruce R. Zetter, Roger H. Unger and Eric K. Rowinsky.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annual Review of Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annual Review of Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annual Review of Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Annual Review of Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annual Review of Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annual Review of Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annual Review of Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025