This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Mycoscience. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Mycoscience with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mycoscience more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Mycoscience. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Mycoscience.
About Mycoscience
The 2.0k papers published in Mycoscience in the last decades have received a total of 26.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Mycoscience usually cover Cell Biology (1.1k papers), Plant Science (1.5k papers), Pharmacology (481 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (494 papers) and Insect Science (208 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (1.1k papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (972 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (464 papers), Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (365 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (274 papers), Plant Pathogens and Resistance (167 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (134 papers) and Powdery Mildew Fungal Diseases (100 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Mycoscience are Susumu Takamatsu, Yu‐Cheng Dai, Takayuki Aoki, M. Catherine Aime, Kerry O’Donnell, Makoto Kakishima, Tsutomu Hattori, Takashi Osono, Akira Ohta and Akiyoshi Yamada.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.