The International Sports Law Journal

317 papers and 849 indexed citations i.

About

The 317 papers published in The International Sports Law Journal in the last decades have received a total of 849 indexed citations. Papers published in The International Sports Law Journal usually cover Sociology and Political Science (223 papers), Economics and Econometrics (109 papers) and Gender Studies (66 papers) specifically the topics of Doping in Sports (175 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (106 papers) and Sports, Gender, and Society (64 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The International Sports Law Journal are Johan Lindholm, Ross Tucker, Erik Boye, Roger A. Pielke, Brian Doyle, Robert C.R. Siekmann, Mark James, Sarah Kelly, Stephen Weatherill and Bengt Kayser.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The International Sports Law Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The International Sports Law Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The International Sports Law Journal.

Countries where authors publish in The International Sports Law Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The International Sports Law Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The International Sports Law Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The International Sports Law Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025