The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association

5.4k citations
363 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

    • American and British Literature Analysis 16
    • Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies 12
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism 11
    • Crime and Detective Fiction Studies 10
    • Themes in Literature Analysis 10
    • Literature: history, themes, analysis 10
    • Latin American and Latino Studies 10
    • Gothic Literature and Media Analysis 8

The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association

161 papers receiving 994 citations

Peers

The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Literature and Literary Theory 1.7k
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 401
  • Gender Studies 613
  • Music 199
  • Cultural Studies 512
Replace differences with:
differences United States
Configurations United States
Woman s Art Journal United Kingdom
The Translator United Kingdom
Narrative United States
Camera Obscura Feminism Culture and Media Studies United States
Criticism United States
College literature United States
Journal of Visual Culture United States
Anthropological Theory United States
The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association relative to differences United States differences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
differences · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association more than expected).

Fields of papers published in The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association.

About The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association

The 363 papers published in The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association in the last decades have received a total of 5.4k indexed citations . Papers published in The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (130 papers), Cultural Studies (30 papers), History (31 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (12 papers) and Geography, Planning and Development (13 papers) specifically the topics of American and British Literature Analysis (16 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (12 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (11 papers), Crime and Detective Fiction Studies (10 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (10 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (10 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (10 papers) and Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (8 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association are Teresa de Lauretis, Vincent B. Leitch, Kaja Silverman, Betty R. McGraw, Michael Eldred, Lauren Rabinovitz, Peter Sloterdijk, Bruce Krajewski, Jana Sawicki and Tzvetan Todorov.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact