The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association

6.3k citations
357 papers · · active since 1984

Impact in

    • Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
    • Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
    • American and British Literature Analysis
    • Gender and Feminist Studies
    • Gender, Feminism, and Media

Papers in

    • Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics 58
    • Modernist Literature and Criticism 31
    • American and British Literature Analysis 28
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism 27
    • Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies 21
    • Contemporary Literature and Criticism 20
    • Literature: history, themes, analysis 19
    • American Literature and Culture 33

The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association

245 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Literature and Literary Theory 2.2k
  • Gender Studies 756
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 665
  • Classics 290
  • Cultural Studies 396
Replace Configurations with:
Configurations United States
differences United States
Woman s Art Journal United Kingdom
Oxford Art Journal United Kingdom
Subjectivity United Kingdom
Narrative United States
CR The New Centennial Review United States
Language and Literature International Journal of Stylistics United Kingdom
Tijdschrift voor Philosophie Belgium
Osiris United States
The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association relative to Configurations United States Configurations's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Configurations · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association more than expected).

Fields of papers published in The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association.

About The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association

The 357 papers published in The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association in the last decades have received a total of 6.3k indexed citations . Papers published in The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (248 papers), History (58 papers), Classics (18 papers), Philosophy (41 papers) and Gender Studies (22 papers) specifically the topics of Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics (58 papers), American Literature and Culture (33 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (31 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (28 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (27 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (21 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (20 papers) and Literature: history, themes, analysis (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association are Teresa de Lauretis, Vincent B. Leitch, Kaja Silverman, Betty R. McGraw, Tzvetan Todorov, Dudley Andrew, Bruce Krajewski, Peter Sloterdijk, Lauren Rabinovitz and Jana Sawicki.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact