Tijdschrift voor Philosophie

486 papers and 5.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 486 papers published in Tijdschrift voor Philosophie in the last decades have received a total of 5.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Tijdschrift voor Philosophie usually cover Philosophy (197 papers), Sociology and Political Science (61 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (35 papers) specifically the topics of Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (49 papers), Philosophy and Historical Thought (49 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Tijdschrift voor Philosophie are Herman Parret, Sybren Heyndels, Axel Honneth, Jürgen Habermas, Paul Cortois, Paul Ricœur, Michael Ruse, David Lightfoot, Norbert Hornstein and Sudipta Kaviraj.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Tijdschrift voor Philosophie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Tijdschrift voor Philosophie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Tijdschrift voor Philosophie.

Countries where authors publish in Tijdschrift voor Philosophie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Tijdschrift voor Philosophie. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Tijdschrift voor Philosophie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tijdschrift voor Philosophie more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025